Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Good Wednesday or Good Friday?
#98
Alan G77 Wrote:First of all my friend, for you to come here and not only put words into my mouth but also blatantly misrepresent the Assyrian Churches stance on the Law is dubious and insulting.

If you had a basic understanding of New Testament theological constructs you would conclude that the works of the Law is what I am actually referring to. According to you and the rest of the judaizer's that regularly visit these forums, you would have us believe that we must observe Old Testament laws in order to be saved.

Let us see what St Paul has to say...

1 [a]You foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified? 2 This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of [b]the Law, or by [c]hearing with faith? 3 Are you so foolish? Having begun [d]by the Spirit, are you now [e]being perfected by the flesh? 4 Did you [f]suffer so many things in vain?if indeed it was in vain? 5 So then, does He who provides you with the Spirit and works [g]miracles among you, do it by the works of [h]the Law, or by [i]hearing with faith?

Do we pervert Gods moral law by rejecting the sabbath? No, the sabbath and the works of the law were fulfilled in Jesus Christ and through Him only are we able to discern what is moral or immoral. The law could not save men, if the law could save men then we would have no need for Jesus to have hung upon the Cross. When we are baptized and repent, the Holy Spirit is poured gracefully upon us and through Him we are taught and by Him do we understand that murder, rape, theft etc is against His commands.


Alan,

first off, I never put words into your mouth, I only but asked if this is what you were implying as you made a blanket statement. Not my fault you where not specific whereby hard to grasp and needing clarified.

secondly, I have no idea of what the Assyrian Church' stance on the Law is, and did not try to represent it at all. When did I even mention Assyrian Church' stance on the Law, much less the Assyrian Church. If you are representing it that' not my problem, nor am I their' as I am not representing them much less any group of men only my Master and His Good News through His Apostles.

thirdly, it is you that has tried to put words into my mouth claiming that I said this and that. Something I never did to you. Again, I only but asked a question, I made no statements for you as you have tried to do for me. Please learn to speak for yourself. And by all means feel free to ask questions too.

fourthly, I am not offended that you did try to put words into my mouth whereby misrepresenting my Master because I battle against spirit not flesh, so know that you are forgiven, but the spirit that lead you to be offended and make such railing accusations against me I rebuke in the Authority of Yahu-Shuah my Master, son of Yahuwah Whom is Sovereign over all Creation.

Now that we got the niceties out of the way, I lay claim that you still did not clarify what you are trying to say, at least when it come to my itty bitty brain anyway. So let me see if I can guess as to what you are implying by "works of the law". That the Law is not done away with just the fact that we do not need to obey them anymore because that would be considered to be ?works of the flesh?(?). That Obeying the Law would equate to Works and they (works) are not required(?). Please correct me if I guest wrong to your less that specific statement(s). PLEASE BE SPECIFIC as broad statements are hard to grasp the full meaning thereof. Just whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat does "work of the law mean"?

As far as my conclusions about Salvation see my latest response to "Thirdwoe", and also the following (beings you asked) I hope that I am specific enough to leave no doubt as to what my Master and Savior claims we must do to gain salvation through Him.

[By the way I am not a judaizer and find that to be an offensive remark. Yet again I battle not the flesh but the spirit which led you, and therefore rebuke it for using such a curse word, while finding understanding towards you.]

Now being you only brought up a little bit of what Shaul [Paul] said about the Law, and being his saying are easily misunderstood, I thought it only proper to reply with more of the Gospel on the subject to help bring out what is actually being said by Shaul and the other Disciples of Yahu-Shuah The Anointed One. But first and please forgive me for using the Greek to make my point as I do not yet have an Aramaic translation with numbers to hunt it down in the dictionaries to figure out it definitions within The Aramaic language.

Nomos (Strong?s 3551) is the Greek word translated "law" in the (Greek) New Testament. Nomos has many definitions -- it can mean law of the land, any codified law/set of laws, a basic principle, and of course, it can mean Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah]. There was no specific Greek word for "legalism" and often nomos is used when Shaul [Paul] is referring to legalism -- since legalism itself is also a set of laws, nomos fits well there too.

Having defined law, it's time to define 'lawlessness.' In Greek, it is anomos -- that is, anti-law. Many called Christians tend to assume that every single instance of 'law' in the Scriptures can only mean Torah (above it is shown that is not true in all cases -- its a broad word); yet few stop to think of the ramifications. If 'law' can only mean Torah --- then what does "lawless' mean? Anti-Torah? In the case of lawlessness, I happen to agree that the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] is indeed meant -- that the sign of the end times would be "Torah-lessness." Many Christians often brag that they are "free from Law" not realizing that's just a seemingly nice way of saying "without law" or "having no law." (i.e. ? Lawless/workers of iniquity)

The argument is made by many Christians (with straight faces no less!) that Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] was only given to show man how sinful he was, to show he could not keep Torah and that he needed a Savior. A few problems here. In the first place, Torah wasn't given to show us how sinful we were but how Set-Apart [Holy] Yahuwah our Ailoheem is. Yahuwah our Ailoheem said He gave Torah to show man how to live as a mikra ['called out'] people (note, "Congregation" and or "Assembly" are modern English translations of the Greek word ekklesia-- which also means mikra, that is, "Called Out Ones"). Torah is a lifestyle document. Many Christians would have you believe Yahuwah our Ailoheem gave Torah to His Chosen People so that He could later introduce "Grace" and then condemn His original Chosen People in favor of other nations (What?). If that was how Yahuwah our Ailoheem treated His Chosen Ones -- how much better will He treat His non-Chosen Ones? Would an Ailoheem of love deliberately give people a document they could not obey, and then condemn them for their expected failure? Yahu-Shuah [Yahu Saves] came 1500 years after Torah was given --- that's 1500 years of fruitless efforts to obey? No way!

When Yahuwah our Ailoheem gave the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah], He promised blessings for obedience, punishments for disobedience. Yishra-Ail [Israel] did stray from Torah and received many punishments -- right up to being taken into captivity. If the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] wasn't keepable, if it was given only as a trick to show it couldn't be kept -- that would make Yahuwah our Ailoheem a sadist for punishing people for failing to do an impossible task that He set for them!

The Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] was not given to show man couldn't keep it. To the contrary, Yahuwah our Ailoheem Himself declared the Torah was keepable! Yahuwah our Ailoheem said in Debarim [Deuteronomy] 30:11-14:
"For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not too hard for thee, neither is it far off. It is not in Heaven, that thou should say: 'Who shall go up for us to Heaven, and bring it unto us, and make us to hear it, that we may do it?' Neither is it beyond the sea that thou should say: 'Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, and make us to hear it, that we may do it?' But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou may do it."

The Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] is keepable --- and there is no other. He has given it all here --- there is no other Torah up in Heaven or in the sea --- this is it! And it is keepable -- it is "not too hard for thee." Now if Yahuwah our Ailoheem says it is keepable, no man-made doctrine to the contrary should be accepted. There is not a single command given in the Torah that was impossible to keep. Man chooses to disobey -- the fault lies within man, not the Torah.

Was the Torah a temporary document until ?The Anointed One? came?

Torah NEVER states that it? end will come or that it will be changed later. Did Yahuwah our Ailoheem not foresee He would send an Anointed One? Indeed He did -- and realizing the lawless beliefs that would later come, Yahuwah our Ailoheem added a special clause to the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah]:
{Debarim [Deuteronomy] 4:2} "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of Yahuwah your Ailoheem which I command you."
See also:
{Debarim [Deuteronomy] 12:32} "What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shall not add thereto, nor diminish from it."

Following this passage to not add to or take away from the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah], is a warning against false prophets (Deuteronomy 13). A false prophet is *anyone* who comes teaching the people to disregard Yahuwah our Ailoheem' Torah[Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah]! Yahuwah our Ailoheem warns these false prophets will test the people's faithfulness to Him -- His people will instead "walk after Yahuwah our Ailoheem, and fear Him, and keep His commandments, and obey His voice, and ye shall serve Him, and cleave unto Him" (Debarim [Deuteronomy] 13:4). At the time of Yahu-Shuah [Yahu Saves], the only way to test those who claimed to be prophets of Yahuwah our Ailoheem was to compare what they taught to the teachings of the Torah - PERIOD! There was no other test! So when the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] is cast aside as irrelevant -- so is the foundation that proved Yahu-Shuah *is* The Anointed One.

Yahu-Shuah never taught against the Torah --- if he had, he would be considered a false prophet! Yahu-Shuah and the Torah cannot be contrary to each other -- each must validate the other. Be wary of man-made church doctrines espousing an "Anointed One" loosely based on the life of Yahu-Shuah HaMoshiach [The Anointed One] -- an "Anointed One" who is credited with turning the people away from the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah]. The real Yahu-Shuah came "*not* to destroy the law (i.e.- The Torah), or the prophets: but to fulfill" (Mattith-Yahu 5:17 [Matthew]). Fulfill means to bring it to it fullest capacity as to what is written -- and -- not to abolish or change! Anyone teaching to 'take away' from the Torah is a false teacher and anyone adding to the Torah is a false teacher according to the Scriptures themselves.. Think about the arguments between Christianity and Yahu-Daism [Judaism] .... Ironically, for two-thousand years now, Yahuwah our Ailoheem has had four sets of people: Torah rejecting (so-called) believers; Yahu-Shuah rejecters who add man-made writings to the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah]; Those whom believe that Yahu-Shuah came as the Torah incarnate and follow Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] as well; and those that do not believe at all. Could either of these groups please Yahuwah our Ailoheem?

Is the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] Forever?
{Debarim [Deuteronomy] 7:9} "Know therefore that Yahuwah your Ailoheem, He is Ailoheem, the faithful Ailoheem, which keeps Covenant and mercy with them that love Him and keep His commandments to a thousand generations."

The Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] declares itself to be everlasting -- forever. It's Shabbawths were appointed forever -- NOT just until The Anointed One came!
{Exodus 31:16} "Wherefore the children of Yishra-Ail shall keep the Shabbawth, to observe the Shabbawth throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant."
{Leviticus 24:8} "Every Shabbawth he shall set it in order before Yahuwah continually, being taken from the children of Yishra-Ail [Israel] by an everlasting Covenant."

All doctrines must be tested against the Torah for accuracy. If one holds a doctrine that contradicts the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] --- their doctrine is wrong --- and they are guilty of lawlessness. The Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] is the foundation of the True Faith. Misunderstanding this fact leads to incorrect doctrines and a skewed mistaken view of Scripture. As Shaul [Paul] says "The Torah is Set-Apart [Holy], and the Commandment Set-Apart [Holy], and just, and good." (Romans 7:12)

Keep in mind that the only Scripture they had back when they were writing the New Testament was the Old Testament and the New Testament lays claim to the fact that:
2Ti 3:16 FOR all scripture which from the Spirit is written, is profitable for doctrine, and for rebuke, and for correction, and for instruction [Or, discipline.] which is in righteousness:
2Ti 3:17 that the man of Ailoheem may be perfect unto every good work, and completed.

The sign of the end times is lawlessness ... are you a part of the apostasy or the Truth? Don't be lawless.

End Note: But Doesn't "Law of Christ" replace Torah?

Oddly, In the same breath many Christians claim Yahu-Shuah *is* Ailoheem, they manage to say the "Law [Torah] of Christ" is not the same as "Law [Torah] of Ailoheem". Many Christians claim the "Law [Torah] of Christ" is as follows: "And thou shall love the LORD thy Ailoheem with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. And the second is like, namely this, Thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these (Markos [Mark] 12:30,31).

However, these commands are not new, they are found in the Torah:
{Debarim [Deuteronomy] 6:5} And thou shall love Yahuwah your Ailoheem with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might"

{Leviticus 19:18} "Do not make attempts to get equal with one who has done you wrong, or keep hard feelings against the children of your people, but have love for your neighbor as for yourself: I am Yahuwah."


Further, Yahu-Shuah quoted these *after* quoting the Shema, a quintessential text of Yahu-Daism [Judaism] from Debarim [Deut] 6:4, "HEAR, O YISHRA-AIL: YAHUWAH OUR AILOHEEM, YAHUWAH IS ONE."

All the other Old Testament Laws/Torah/Instruction for righteous living with in the Kingdom of Yahuwah hang from these two Old Testament saying. The first four of the Ten Commandments hang under Love Yahuwah your Ailoheem, and the other six hang under love they neighbor as thyself. The rest of the Old Testament Laws/Torah/Instruction for righteous living with in the Kingdom of Yahuwah further hang under the ten Commandments.

Yahu-Shuah' Law [Torah] *is* Yahuwah' Law [Torah]. Where the Law [Torah] of The Anointed One differs isn't in regard to Yahuwah' Law [Torah], but man'. Were the Pharisees sought to malign the Old testament Law with their man made ideas so have many Christian sought to malign the Torah with their man made ideas. Yahu-Shuah came to correctly interpret the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] not to delete It. Man had added to Yahuwah' Law [Torah] in an attempt to fence and protect Yahuwah' Law [Torah], and in the process, parts of Yahuwah' Law [Torah] had been misunderstood. Yahu-Shuah helped define what the Law [Torah] was really teaching (The "Sermon on the Mount" is an excellent example of Yahu-Shuah clarifying Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah]). When Yahu-Shuah summed up the Law [Torah] into these two commands, he was conveying essential principles -- love Yahuwah and love your neighbor. But how does Yahuwah want us to love Him? How does He want us to love our neighbor? We're back to the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] -- we need the Torah [Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] to define "how" to love Yahuwah and our neighbor.

The following are Pro-Torah [Pro-Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah] Observant Verses within the New Testament:

{Loukanus [Luke] 16:16,17} "The Law [Torah] and the prophets were until Yahu-Khawnawn [John]: since that time the kingdom of Ailoheem is preached, and every man presses into it. And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the Law [Torah] to fail."

{Loukanus [Luke] 1:6} "And they were both righteous before Ailoheem, walking in all the Commandments and ordinances of Yahuwah blameless."

{Acts 24:14} "But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the Ailoheem of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the Law [Torah] and in the prophets."

{Romans 2:13} "(For not the hearers of the Law [Torah] are just before Ailoheem, but the doers of the Law [Torah (Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah)] shall be justified)."

{Romans 3:31} "Do we then make void the Law [Torah (Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah)] through faith? Ailoheem forbid: yea, we establish the Law [Torah (Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah)]."

{Romans 7:12} "Wherefore the Law [Torah] is Set-Apart [Holy], and the Commandment Set-Apart [Holy], and just, and good."

{Romans 7:14} "For we know that the Law[Torah (Set of Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah)] is Spiritual: .. ? ."

{Romans 7:22} "For I delight in the Law[Torah] of Ailoheem after the inward man."

{Revelation 12:17} "And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the Commandments of Ailoheem, and have the testimony of Yahu-Shuah the Anointed One [the one that taught Torah (Instructions for Set-Apart Living within the Kingdom of Yahuwah)]."

{Revelation 14:12} "Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the Commandments of Ailoheem, and the faith of Yahu-Shuah."

{1 Yahu-Khawnawn [1 John] 2:3-6} "And hereby we do know that we know Him, if we keep His Commandments. He that says, I know him, and keeps not His Commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoso keeps His word, in him verily is the love of Ailoheem perfected: hereby know we that we are in Him. He that says he abides in Him ought himself also so to walk, even as He walked [i.e. ? do the same things as Yahu-Shuah did]."

{1 Kafe [Peter] 1:15} But as he who has called you is Set-Apart [Holy], so be Set-Apart [Holy] in all manner of conduct;

{1 Kafe [Peter] 1:16} Because it is written, You will be Set-Apart [Holy]; for I am Set-Apart.

{2 Kafe [Peter] 3:2} That you may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the Set-Apart [Holy] prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Master and Savior:

{Act 1:5} For Yahu-Khawnawn [John] truly baptized with water; but you shall be baptized with the Set-Apart [Holy] Spirit not many days from now.

{Act 2:38} Then Kafe [Peter] said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Yahu-Shuah the Anointed One for the remission of sins, and you shall receive the gift of the Set-Apart [Holy] Spirit.

{Act 11:16} Then remembered I the word of the Master, how he said, Yahu-Khawnawn [John] indeed baptized with water; but you shall be baptized with the Set-Apart [Holy] Spirit.

{Act 19:2} He said unto them, Received you the Holy Spirit when you believed?

{Act 1:8} But you shall receive power, after the Holy Spirit has come upon you: and you shall be witnesses unto me both in Yerushalayim, and in all Yahu-Dea [Judea], and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.

{2 Kafe [2 Peter] 3:11-13} Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought you to be in all Set-Apart [Holy] conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening unto the coming of the day of Ailoheem, in which the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, in which dwells righteousness [i.e. - not Lawlessness]

The Good News of Yahu-Shuah says:

{Eph 5:27} That He might present it to Himself a glorious Congregation/Assembly [Called out Ones], not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be Set-Apart [Holy] and without blemish.

{Loukanus [Luke] 9:26} For whosoever shall be ashamed of Me and of My words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when He shall come in His own glory, and in His Father's, and of the Set-Apart [Holy] Messengers [Angels].

And again,

{Markos [Mark] 8:38} Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of Me and of My words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when He comes in the glory of His Father with the Set-Apart [Holy] Messengers [Angels].

Repent of Lawless thinking!!!

And if one say that Shaul [Paul] taught that we did not have to keep the Instructions of Yahuwah because of Grace consider that he received the same Set-Apart Spirit:

{Act 9:17} ?And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Shaul [Paul], the Master, even Yahu-Shuah, that appeared unto you in the way as you came, has sent me, that you might receive your sight, and be filled with the Set-Apart [Holy] Spirit.?

Now this Set-Apart Spirit is to lead us into all Righteousness,, and that is what Shaul [Saul/Paul] taught as well. Keep in mind that many of the aforementioned Scriptures about the Torah [Law] were written by Shaul [Saul/Paul] and Shaul taught exactly what the other Apostles taught. Salvation came through following Yahu-Shuah as Master and doing what He said to do through faith ~ LET YAHU-SHUAH TORAH THROUGH US LEAD BY THE SET-APART SPIRIT WITHIN US ~ PERIOD. Anything that is not of Yahu-Shuah doing Torah in our lives is considered as filthy rags to His Heavenly Father that He came to restore us back unto, awmane. REPENT IF NEED BE(?)!

P.s. - do not think for a minute that it is me that says these thing but the Spirit that leads me. So if you do not like the Spirit in which I share the Good News rebuke it.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-23-2010, 03:19 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by judge - 07-25-2010, 10:21 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-25-2010, 11:57 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by noordos - 07-26-2010, 10:25 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-27-2010, 12:00 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by distazo - 07-28-2010, 08:23 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-28-2010, 09:05 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by distazo - 07-29-2010, 06:57 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-29-2010, 02:33 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-29-2010, 07:07 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by noordos - 07-31-2010, 12:13 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-31-2010, 04:23 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by ograabe - 08-05-2010, 03:13 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 08-05-2010, 04:07 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 08-19-2010, 02:21 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by noordos - 08-19-2010, 10:46 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 08-20-2010, 03:27 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by noordos - 08-20-2010, 11:02 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 08-21-2010, 02:24 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-01-2011, 06:53 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 05-01-2011, 08:49 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-01-2011, 09:37 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-01-2011, 03:19 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-02-2011, 04:22 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-02-2011, 10:53 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-03-2011, 01:22 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-03-2011, 08:45 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-08-2011, 05:20 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-08-2011, 05:29 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-08-2011, 05:54 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-08-2011, 10:39 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-08-2011, 10:44 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-09-2011, 04:44 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-09-2011, 10:24 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-09-2011, 10:33 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-09-2011, 02:17 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-09-2011, 03:33 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-10-2011, 02:39 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-10-2011, 03:00 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-10-2011, 04:59 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by borota - 05-10-2011, 10:58 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by borota - 05-10-2011, 11:29 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-10-2011, 11:31 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-10-2011, 11:39 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-10-2011, 12:44 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by borota - 05-10-2011, 12:46 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by borota - 05-10-2011, 01:32 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by borota - 05-10-2011, 06:54 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 05-10-2011, 07:16 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-10-2011, 10:27 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-10-2011, 10:29 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by borota - 05-11-2011, 12:32 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-11-2011, 01:01 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-11-2011, 05:32 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-11-2011, 09:56 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-11-2011, 09:59 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-11-2011, 01:58 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-12-2011, 12:09 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-17-2011, 07:06 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-17-2011, 11:21 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-18-2011, 05:19 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-26-2011, 10:28 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-27-2011, 12:16 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-27-2011, 05:11 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-27-2011, 06:22 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 05-29-2011, 03:15 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Daniel814 - 05-29-2011, 04:55 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 05-31-2011, 07:17 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 06-06-2011, 10:11 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 06-07-2011, 06:27 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-20-2011, 04:06 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 07-20-2011, 04:32 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 07-20-2011, 12:26 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 07-20-2011, 01:00 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 07-20-2011, 01:25 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 07-20-2011, 07:41 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by bar Sinko - 07-20-2011, 08:46 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by borota - 07-20-2011, 10:54 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-21-2011, 03:57 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 07-21-2011, 04:08 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-21-2011, 03:09 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-21-2011, 05:45 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by The Texas RAT - 07-21-2011, 06:08 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 07-22-2011, 12:11 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Dani - 07-22-2011, 09:58 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 07-22-2011, 06:41 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-22-2011, 11:06 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by rramlow - 07-23-2011, 05:09 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-23-2011, 05:28 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-23-2011, 07:21 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-24-2011, 05:15 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 02:22 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-25-2011, 02:43 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 02:56 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-25-2011, 03:13 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 03:20 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-25-2011, 05:34 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-25-2011, 05:38 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 06:24 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-25-2011, 06:47 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 07:22 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 08:44 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-25-2011, 05:24 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 06:17 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by konway87 - 07-25-2011, 06:26 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 08:24 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-25-2011, 08:48 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Alan G77 - 07-26-2011, 09:22 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 07-26-2011, 05:47 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Sarah - 02-18-2013, 03:03 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Sarah - 03-02-2013, 03:04 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Thirdwoe - 03-02-2013, 07:52 AM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by Sarah - 03-28-2013, 01:40 PM
Re: Good Wednesday or Good Friday? - by ClaudeA - 05-15-2013, 12:42 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)