02-22-2010, 09:51 PM
Greetings all,
As a result of my philosophical studies, I know that one cannot respond to an argument until one has completely comprehended the argument's conclusions, reasons, and assumptions. With this in mind, I am currently unable to contribute anything meaningful to the issue of Aramaic Primacy because I do not totally understand the argument behind it. Could someone list the main points of the argument for me?
Thank you
As a result of my philosophical studies, I know that one cannot respond to an argument until one has completely comprehended the argument's conclusions, reasons, and assumptions. With this in mind, I am currently unable to contribute anything meaningful to the issue of Aramaic Primacy because I do not totally understand the argument behind it. Could someone list the main points of the argument for me?
Thank you