09-26-2008, 10:09 AM
Thirdwoe Wrote:Mr. Bauscher took lots of heat for his false doctrines while he was still posting here.... preterism, universalism, cessasionism, bible codes....etc, etc.Among those false doctrines, I, too, am a universalist. <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/wink1.gif" alt="" title="Wink" /><!-- s -->
These are not attacks on the Man, but a mans false doctrines that need to be shown for what they are. False.
I have nothing against Mr. Bauscher personally, but I do have something against the false doctrines themselves, and will show them to be so.
This is about a translation that was put out to the world....and it is being examined....where false doctrines show up in it, it should be exposed.
This has nothing to do with Mr. Bauscher's personal sins in his life, where that Scripture you alude to would apply.
Now, I do not object to the attacks on the volume. I objected to the post I quoted because it crossed a line. As long as we only address the translation on the basis of its technical merit, I am happy. The attack here has not been based on its technical merit. It is based on the precondition that tongues is a certain thing. This does nothing to prove whether or not his translation is correct. This is basing textual criticism and interpretation on personal doctrine, rather than the other way 'round, as it should be.
Let me put all I've said above this way: Is Mr. Bauscher's translation technically wrong in these cases?