09-08-2008, 05:21 PM
Shlama Akhay,
I don't think there can be any question, for Gywnn didn't merely offer his opinion but based it on the actual subscriptions to the manuscripts:
Can there be any doubt about the subject of where the Aramaic translation of the W5 came from, and why the CoE rejected them? (keep in mind that Philoxenus was a Monophysite, and bitter foe of the CoE)
+Shamasha
I don't think there can be any question, for Gywnn didn't merely offer his opinion but based it on the actual subscriptions to the manuscripts:
Quote:"Which were translated from the Greek into the Syriac for the holy Philoxenus, Bishop of Mabbug. (927th year of Alexander)"
Can there be any doubt about the subject of where the Aramaic translation of the W5 came from, and why the CoE rejected them? (keep in mind that Philoxenus was a Monophysite, and bitter foe of the CoE)
+Shamasha