Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge
#7
I think the only way I can explain this is by giving an example. When you read Murdock you regularly come across what I call "snicker notes." Murdock snickers at what he perceives as mistranslations in the Peshitto. However, in the text he translates it as the Peshitto has it. It is irrelevant to him if the Peshitto does or does not support his doctrines. If it does, great. If it does not, it's a mistranslation. So he is able to achieve a greater level of objectivity than a Peshitta primacist is.
Does that make more sense? I think I am really addressing a completely different issue than the one that you and akhan Paul are addressing.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by Dawid - 07-08-2008, 02:22 AM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by Dawid - 07-08-2008, 12:42 PM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by Dawid - 07-08-2008, 05:18 PM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by ograabe - 07-08-2008, 05:55 PM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by gbausc - 07-08-2008, 07:27 PM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by Dawid - 07-08-2008, 10:54 PM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by Dawid - 07-09-2008, 12:56 PM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by gbausc - 07-09-2008, 01:27 PM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by ograabe - 07-09-2008, 07:49 PM
Re: Comparing Lamsa with Etheridge - by gbausc - 07-09-2008, 11:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)