Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Israel
#1
Landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Israel

On April 16, 2008, the Supreme Court of Israel ruled that "being a
Messianic Jew does not prevent one from receiving citizenship in
Israel under the Law of Return or the Law of Citizenship, " reversing
a
previous ruling from 1989 whereby the court denied the right of return
to Gary and Shirley Beresford, Messianic Jews from South Africa.

In a landmark decision the Supreme Court of Israel ratified a
settlement between twelve Messianic Jewish believers and the State of
Israel, which states that being a Messianic Jew does not prevent one
from receiving citizenship in Israel under the Law of Return or the
Law of Citizenship, if one is a descendant of Jews on one's father's
side (and thus not Jewish according to halacha).

This Supreme Court decision brought an end to a legal battle that has
carried on for two and a half years. The applicants were represented
by Yuval Grayevsky and Calev Myers from the offices of Yehuda Raveh &
Co., and their legal costs were subsidized by the Jerusalem Institute
of Justice.

All twelve of the applicants were denied citizenship solely based on
grounds that they belong to the Messianic Jewish community. Most of
them received letters stating that they would not receive citizenship
because they "commit missionary activity". One of the applicants was
told by a clerk at the Ministry of Interior that because she
"committed missionary activity", she is "acting against the interests
of the State of Israel and against the Jewish people". These
allegations are not only untrue, but they also do not constitute legal
grounds to deny one's right to immigrate to Israel.

This important victory paves the way for persons who have Jewish
ancestry on their father's side to immigrate to Israel freely, whether
or not they belong to the Messianic Jewish community. This is yet
another battle won in our war to establish equality in Israel for the
Messianic Jewish community just like every other legitimate stream of
faith within the Jewish world.

Praise Yah!
Reply
#2
*Albion* Wrote:Landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Israel


In a landmark decision the Supreme Court of Israel ratified a
settlement between twelve Messianic Jewish believers and the State of
Israel, which states that being a Messianic Jew does not prevent one
from receiving citizenship in Israel under the Law of Return or the
Law of Citizenship, if one is a descendant of Jews on one's father's
side (and thus not Jewish according to halacha).

Actually, this is not making any changes in the law. It is just making sure
the law of return is being fairly applied. Anyone who is halachaly Jewish
loses their right of return if they have accepted a faith other than
Judaism. According to the courts, this includes Messianic Judaism.

If one is a descendent of Jews on one's father's side, one is not Jewish
by halachah or by Israeli law. Therefore these non-Jewish Messianics
should be able to receive citizenship since they meet the criterion
necessary (at least one Jewish parent or grandparent). To ban
them would be wrong, and the court is just asserting this fact.
However, this does not make them Jewish, nor does it change the
law banning Jewish messianics from making aliyah.
Reply
#3
Shlama Forum:
Here is a little more information concerning Aliyah (The Law of Return).

Jerusalem Post Article:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1208870469395">http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 8870469395</a><!-- m -->

Baptist Press:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=27874&ref=BPNews-RSSFeed0421">http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=278 ... SSFeed0421</a><!-- m -->

Messianic Jewish Musings:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://derek4messiah.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/breaking-news-israeli-supreme-court-allows-messianics-in/">http://derek4messiah.wordpress.com/2008 ... ianics-in/</a><!-- m -->

This new ruling holds particular interest for me because my father was Jewish, though my mother was not. I tried in 1982 to emigrate under the Law of Return, but was prevented from doing so. I had to return to Canada before my second three month visa extension expired. Perhaps I can now reapply without prejudice.

Shlama,
Stephen
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com">http://www.dukhrana.com</a><!-- m -->
Reply
#4
Quote:This new ruling holds particular interest for me because my father was Jewish, though my mother was not. I tried in 1982 to emigrate under the Law of Return, but was prevented from doing so. I had to return to Canada before my second three month visa extension expired. Perhaps I can now reapply without prejudice.
You should have been able to emigrate since your father was Jewish. The state will not accept you as Jewish, but that is
what this lawsuit settled- the unfair application of the law.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)