Acts 2:24 Redux

[Paul Younan]

Dave,

Acts 2:24 is not an OT quote.

This discussion is over unless you can explain how the Greek got "pain" here, unless they were translating from the Aramaic NT which reads "Khawla."

Again, stick this in your head - there is no OT quote here in Acts 2:24. There is no Septuagint to follow.

Even if there were, then your best explanation would be that Luke wasn't inspired of the Holy Spirit and that we should throw all of his handiwork in the trash, since as you claim he was a fraud who was copying from the LXX and not quoting Keepa's speech correctly. If your Bible is this full of mistakes, then so is your faith and we have nothing to trust in at all except the voices you hear in your head.

Quit playing games and explain how the Greek got "pain" in there without reference to a written Aramaic original.

Otherwise, be a man and admit that the Greek is a translation from Aramaic. There are no other options open to you at this point. It's black-and-white.

Either the Aramaic is the original, or the Greek is.

Which one is it? A corrupt text with a stoopid reading, written by a fraud who made mistakes......or a clean text in the language of the Gospel and the Messiah, which reads perfectly and explains the error in the Greek.

It's your choice what you want to believe in. Nobody else is coming to the defense of the Greek here. It's pretty obvious to everyone what happened here, except of course to someone like you who is in denial.