09-01-2004, 12:37 AM
Again, very interesting Dave!
I read through some of your material you posted on your site. This has some very neat applications.
From your understanding, the so-called catholic epistles add to the text in a good way. This was the first time I seen a method to check this somehow outside of The Holy Spirits leading. Would this technique be beneficial in checking sections that have been debated as possible later additions and interpolations? I know some manuscripts don't have the aduteress section, the John comma, etc. Is this useful in determining if they are legitimate?
The more I understand this the more I'm impressed how you stuck by your convictions on this Dave!
I read through some of your material you posted on your site. This has some very neat applications.
From your understanding, the so-called catholic epistles add to the text in a good way. This was the first time I seen a method to check this somehow outside of The Holy Spirits leading. Would this technique be beneficial in checking sections that have been debated as possible later additions and interpolations? I know some manuscripts don't have the aduteress section, the John comma, etc. Is this useful in determining if they are legitimate?
The more I understand this the more I'm impressed how you stuck by your convictions on this Dave!