Qnoma?...definition

[Paul Younan]

Shlama Lakh Khabibi Abudar,

Your definitions have intrigued me, so let see if I fully understand this:

Human kyana (Nature) -> Nature in this case being Abstract and generic to a group of the same type.

Yes, "nature" is by definition an abstract concept (it doesn't physically exist.) I.e., the "nature of man", the "nature of God", the "nature of fish", etc.

Qnoma -> An individual nature, which is distinct from others of the same nature.

Yes, but distinct only in number. It has no distinguishing characteristics that make up a "person." Other than number, it is exactly the same as other qnomas in the same Kyana. (therefore, all three Qnome of Alaha are the same)

Naphsha -> The actual spirit of this qnoma (more than one qnoma can exit in one soul), entering the person and animating this person. Each soul is unique to one person.

Yes, the Napsha is the "life-breath" which animates the body. So Alaha "breathed" into Adam and he became a "Napsha" (Genesis)

Parsupha -> The actual person which contains this animated soul. As such the soul gives the final shape/form of the person.
Each person is unique.

Yes, a "parsopa" contains all the distinguishing characteristics which makes you and I different.

So when God said that he knew Daniel before he was born, then God is saying that he knew his naphsha (soul), which consisted of his qnoma (qnoma being his individuated nature, from the rest of the human nature). As such when when the animated soul entered Daniel's person, it animated his person based on Daniel's soul image.

Yes, that is a good way of explaining it.

I guess the same would apply to Adam, when God said that He brought him to life by breading through his nostral, knowing that the word naphsha originaly meant breadth.

Absolutely. That is why "napsha" can not be the cognate of the English "self", because the English words does not contain all the same "word imagery" as does the original Aramiac term.