12-22-2003, 09:20 AM
I'm hoping the idea of the subsection will be received well. I see that it will spark some healthy debate and good ideas amongst you linguists, but above all, hopefully it will shed light upon a true rendering of the word throughout those 5 books.
For me, to have this in a "correct" literal english translation means more than you know, so many scholars have flipped the wording in these books around which ever way they felt like it seems.
Maybe, just maybe, Paul would allow one of ya's to send him a file with your translation of a chapter (in whatever font he would use) and post it for critiques by the masses?!?!?!
Never know <!-- s:bigups: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/bigups.gif" alt=":bigups:" title="Big Ups" /><!-- s:bigups: -->
For me, to have this in a "correct" literal english translation means more than you know, so many scholars have flipped the wording in these books around which ever way they felt like it seems.
Maybe, just maybe, Paul would allow one of ya's to send him a file with your translation of a chapter (in whatever font he would use) and post it for critiques by the masses?!?!?!
Never know <!-- s:bigups: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/bigups.gif" alt=":bigups:" title="Big Ups" /><!-- s:bigups: -->