Conder/Aramaic debate commentary

[Paul Younan]

Akhi Paul what happened? Man, I knew it was too good to be true. I knew he would chicken out without the priceless Greek contradictions >:

I still would have liked you to debate him though

My specialty is Aramaic primacy, I'm no Christian Apologist. Have no desire to be. There are plently others who like that sort of thing and are much better at it than I.

Mr. Conner's area of expertise is Atheistic Apologetics. It just wasn't a good match.

It's like putting up Tiger Woods against Shaq. First of all, what game would we have them play?

Even if I utterly convince him of the primacy of Aramaic and the Peshitta, what good could possibly come of that? Most of his objections to the faith have nothing to do with the linguistic aspect, and the vast majority of them would remain.

He would not convince me to reject my faith, and I would not convince him to accept my faith.....what's the point of convincing him that the message he already rejects is an Aramaic one?

Let's forget about this guy and move on with our work.....