10-22-2014, 11:56 PM
There is plenty of evidence that the Gospels have an underlying Aramaic layer. Some interpret this as the text being originally written in Aramaic (Aramaic Primacy) where others interpret this as the source materials used to compile the Gospels were originally in Aramaic, be they oral traditions or earlier documents (the so-called Q source, or other things like the Gospel of Thomas, now since lost -- this is called Aramaic Source Criticism).
Some of the more obscure ones that are among my favorites I've written up over on http://www.AramaicNT.org (check the Articles tab) but I'm sure that others will be chiming in shortly with their favorites, too. <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->
Peace,
-Steve
Some of the more obscure ones that are among my favorites I've written up over on http://www.AramaicNT.org (check the Articles tab) but I'm sure that others will be chiming in shortly with their favorites, too. <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->
Peace,
-Steve