Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Aramaic primacy is NOT an official position of CoE
#4
Steve Caruso on his site had it that Aramaic Primacy was an official position of CoE. So that was mostly in response to that, as his site was referred in one of the recent posts here. Seeing that reference to Steve's site, I took a pick and saw that statement about CoE, among other things.
So my reasoning was that if AP were an official position (an official dogma) your cousin would teach something that goes against the official teachings of CoE. Which obviously is not the case, because there is no such official position.

Since then Steve rectified that mis-statement ...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Aramaic primacy is NOT an official position of CoE - by borota - 10-22-2014, 12:37 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)