Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Refutation to Aramaic primacists
#16
If you don't understand the significance of James 3:18's Janus Parallelism to the topic at hand, there is no point in discussing the matter further with you. Because you haven't bothered to read it. Otherwise, you wouldn't make an asinine statement like "parallelism is a mindset." You completely miss the point of the example, which is a linguistic one. The Janus parallelism only works in one language. Guess which one? Hint: It doesn't start with the letter G.

You are obviously a monolingual English speaker with absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

+Shamasha

Ps. Substance is more important than word count in a post on this forum. You will find that your audience will appreciate a concise and concrete example more than a rambling mishmash of nonsense.


Messages In This Thread
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-19-2014, 11:27 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by enarxe - 03-20-2014, 10:36 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 03-21-2014, 03:29 AM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Paul Younan - 03-22-2014, 07:49 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by sestir - 04-03-2014, 06:13 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Matthew - 04-07-2014, 11:47 PM
Re: Refutation to Aramaic primacists - by Aramaic - 04-22-2014, 04:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)