Cod. Plut. I No. 58

[Paul Younan]

Edit: and of course you are right, akhi Paul <!-- s:biggrin: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/biggrin.gif" alt=":biggrin:" title="Big Grin" /><!-- s:biggrin: --> I take a look at the critical apparatus of the Pusey and Gwilliam editiion of the Gospels corresponding to Add. 7157, and some passages like Mt. 6:32, Mt. 21:4, Mk. 4:18, etc. were corrected by a later hand to match the eastern reading.

Yes, makes sense. Maybe it was purchased by someone in the CoE at some point, but it definitely originates within the western tradition not the eastern. I don't think any eastern manuscripts would have Eusebian Canons (no offense intended, but Eusebius was relatively unknown in the east.) It would be like finding Aaphrahat in a Greek manuscript.

+Shamasha