Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who here has the courage to reject the Pericope Adulterae?
#4
Shlama Khulkon:
I reject the Pericope Adulterae. It is from beginning to end an affront to the written Torah. It contradicts several statutes in the scripture. The trial must be before a judge and witnesses. No witnesses were named. Jesus said he did not come to condemn the world but to save it. It was the task of the Sanhedrin to pass righteous judgement.
Also, the Pericope appears as if it was inserted. The passage makes perfect cohesive sense when the Pericope Adulterae is removed.
Finally, as a New Testament Aramaic Primacist I do not see the Pericope Adulterae in the Aramaic Peshitta New Testament. It only appears in Greek Manuscripts, but not all. The 5th Century Sinaiticus Greek Manuscript does not contain the text.

Shlama,
Stephen Silver
Dukhrana Biblical Research
<!-- w --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com">www.dukhrana.com</a><!-- w -->
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Who here has the courage to reject the Pericope Adultera - by Stephen Silver - 02-22-2011, 10:55 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 02-24-2011, 06:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)