01-31-2011, 11:55 AM
Distazo,
What do you do with the ONE passage I gave you??? Luqa 2:52 remember... No one has addressed that one passage as of yet, all that has been done is to try to justify the "why" of your belief system... And as I said to Stephen, if you cannot answerthat question, it's really not a problem because you aren't alone...
I don't know from where you're reading however both the standard KJ and the Geneva Bibles say "son of G-d"... The Hebrew translation says "beyn ELOHIYM" which also means "son of ELOHIYM"...
The question I asked has nothing to do with The Son being firstborn, nor do you get any argument from me that He indeed is firstborn of YHWH as per Mishley 8 and Yahuchanan 17:5.... so I see no point to you stating that again as if it is germaine to the question at hand...
If perhaps you could find where I said YAHUshuah was "merely a prophet" you would again have a valid point... however YOU CANNOT find such as I have NEVER made such a statememt, so again, the question is why not just answer the question??? How could The Son gain favour with ELOHIYM if He is ELOHIYM???
Thanks,
justalex
What do you do with the ONE passage I gave you??? Luqa 2:52 remember... No one has addressed that one passage as of yet, all that has been done is to try to justify the "why" of your belief system... And as I said to Stephen, if you cannot answerthat question, it's really not a problem because you aren't alone...
I don't know from where you're reading however both the standard KJ and the Geneva Bibles say "son of G-d"... The Hebrew translation says "beyn ELOHIYM" which also means "son of ELOHIYM"...
The question I asked has nothing to do with The Son being firstborn, nor do you get any argument from me that He indeed is firstborn of YHWH as per Mishley 8 and Yahuchanan 17:5.... so I see no point to you stating that again as if it is germaine to the question at hand...
If perhaps you could find where I said YAHUshuah was "merely a prophet" you would again have a valid point... however YOU CANNOT find such as I have NEVER made such a statememt, so again, the question is why not just answer the question??? How could The Son gain favour with ELOHIYM if He is ELOHIYM???
Thanks,
justalex