04-13-2010, 11:35 PM
Good points. Not only is there a subtle nuance between R:Ch:M and Ch:B, but also nuances within their own forms. Ch:B has a peal, pael, and aphel form; and R:Ch:M a peal and pael. It makes for quite a challenge.
For Love of Money
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
For Love of Money - by Jon_in_Charlotte - 04-12-2010, 08:57 PM
Re: For Love of Money - by Jerry - 04-13-2010, 05:20 PM
Re: For Love of Money - by distazo - 04-13-2010, 05:42 PM
Re: For Love of Money - by Burning one - 04-13-2010, 06:57 PM
Re: For Love of Money - by Jerry - 04-13-2010, 08:13 PM
Re: For Love of Money - by Burning one - 04-13-2010, 09:42 PM
Re: For Love of Money - by Jerry - 04-13-2010, 11:35 PM
Re: For Love of Money - by Jon_in_Charlotte - 04-28-2010, 03:44 PM
|