Mingana Peshitta Massorah

[Stephen Silver]

Shlama,

Wow...so is that Romans according to the Eastern order lineup? where do you find the time for all this? <!-- s:onfire: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/onfire.gif" alt=":onfire:" title="On Fire" /><!-- s:onfire: -->

also will it be available in the analysis tool as the 1905 and Khabouris are? is that the goal to which you're working?

i've been doing personal translations from the Khabouris into English in my limited free time this past year -- i've only done 4 books thus far -- and i haven't yet downloaded this Mingana text, so in your opinion is there sufficient difference between the two to merit producing an English translation of this text?


Chayim b'Moshiach,
Jeremy

Shlama Akhi Jeremy:
I've finished the INDEX for Mingana Syriac 148. It is the same text as the Khabouris. There are of course some grammatical variants as between the UBS 1905 Peshitta and the Khabouris Codex. In my 2005 transcription of the Khabouris I colour-coded all of the variants. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the scribe/scribes did the same type of colour-code while producing Mingana Syriac 148. I used blue and they used red. This can be shown throughout the manuscript.

???????????? ?????? ?????????? ??????????????



  201 variant.jpg (Size: 225.82 KB / Downloads: 840)

In my opinion Mingana Syriac 148 is superior to the Khabouris Codex because it has marked all of the variants and is now ascribed as the Peshitta New Testament Massorah.

Shlama,
Stephen
Dukhrana Biblical Research
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.dukhrana.com">http://www.dukhrana.com</a><!-- m -->