10-10-2009, 02:42 PM
shlom lokh oH Nimrod,
I guess we can try to analyse the Aramaic of this verse, and then find a way to place "GBRA" in it, but the simple fact is that the 3 major Peshitta Traditions all agree on the use of "GWRA". I think only the Khabouris manuscript has "GBRA" in it.
If we had other instances in other Eastern Peshitta Manuscripts where "GBRA" is present in this verse, then it would make sense to analyse it, but this seems like a clear case of a scribal error.
Also the fact that the current edition of the COE Peshitta has "GWRA" in it seems to support this as well.
push bshayno,
keefa-morun
I guess we can try to analyse the Aramaic of this verse, and then find a way to place "GBRA" in it, but the simple fact is that the 3 major Peshitta Traditions all agree on the use of "GWRA". I think only the Khabouris manuscript has "GBRA" in it.
If we had other instances in other Eastern Peshitta Manuscripts where "GBRA" is present in this verse, then it would make sense to analyse it, but this seems like a clear case of a scribal error.
Also the fact that the current edition of the COE Peshitta has "GWRA" in it seems to support this as well.
push bshayno,
keefa-morun
???????? ???? ????????
???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ??????????????? ????????????. ?????????????? ?????????? ??????????????????????????
???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ??????????????? ????????????. ?????????????? ?????????? ??????????????????????????