12-18-2008, 08:05 AM
Shlama Akhi Stephen,
It appears that you have missed the point of what I am saying.
I have no dispute as to whether
Crawford Codex reads ?????????????? or whether
Khabouris Codex reads ???????????? ????????????????
My point was that b''khad b'shaba" or d'Had,b'$ab'a` or even D'KHaD,B'SHaB'aA in aramaic is represented as ???????????????????????? which is a conjunction of two words "one" and "Sabbath" and is literally rendered as one word "onesabbath" this is idiomaticaly refered to as one into the sabbath aka Sunday. This is not shown in the text of luke 24:1. What is shown in the text is ???????????? ???????????????? the literal rendering of this phrase is "in one sabbath" and is properly shown as two words but can be shown as one. If you look closely at the phrase in the text you will see that it differs slightly from ???????????????????????? in that the aramaic letter beth is added. Beth, when attached to the beginning of a word, represents the preposition 'in, with or at, in this case it represents "in". It is this subtle difference that changes the meaning in the two phrases, and is not purely dialectic as you asserted earlier. The proof is there in your online lexicon check it out.
Now that I have answered your question, please can we focus on the question that I asked earlier if you do not mind, what evidence do you have that "week" means Sabbath?
Shlama w???burkate
It appears that you have missed the point of what I am saying.
I have no dispute as to whether
Crawford Codex reads ?????????????? or whether
Khabouris Codex reads ???????????? ????????????????
My point was that b''khad b'shaba" or d'Had,b'$ab'a` or even D'KHaD,B'SHaB'aA in aramaic is represented as ???????????????????????? which is a conjunction of two words "one" and "Sabbath" and is literally rendered as one word "onesabbath" this is idiomaticaly refered to as one into the sabbath aka Sunday. This is not shown in the text of luke 24:1. What is shown in the text is ???????????? ???????????????? the literal rendering of this phrase is "in one sabbath" and is properly shown as two words but can be shown as one. If you look closely at the phrase in the text you will see that it differs slightly from ???????????????????????? in that the aramaic letter beth is added. Beth, when attached to the beginning of a word, represents the preposition 'in, with or at, in this case it represents "in". It is this subtle difference that changes the meaning in the two phrases, and is not purely dialectic as you asserted earlier. The proof is there in your online lexicon check it out.
Now that I have answered your question, please can we focus on the question that I asked earlier if you do not mind, what evidence do you have that "week" means Sabbath?
Shlama w???burkate