A Theory of History

[Yochanan5730]

i want to thank everyone for their responses and those to come in this thread and others. thank you for your patience and understanding when it comes to my presumptions and ignorance. i question not to debate, and i may present things that may stir a little, but it is mostly things i have picked up on here and there and said to myself, "Hmmm, i wonder what the forum would say about that?" please believe me, i know that i couldn't stump everyone here <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s --> nor would i try. i am very interested in these things... <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->

anyways, i have learned various things, about myself as well as the scriptures in general. one thing i have learned that is very important, is that knowing hebrew doesn't qualify for understanding aramaic. i have been learning that many things differ between the two languages, and not just pronunciation of things lol but, this is okay <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s --> i will press on.

many will be happy, and hopefully blessed, i do believe i have come to a decision...

the Aramaic is certainly the prime text <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s --> so be expecting questions regarding the differences between western and eastern aramaic, syriac and other things <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->

God's blessings upon each of you,
Z'ev Yochanan