07-05-2005, 04:59 AM
Quote:The Peshitta NT is another matter. No one has ever demonstrated that it contains one error, either factual, grammatical or even orthographical (spelling).
Quote:Matthew 28:19 is the only verse in the entire Bible with the Trinity formula for baptism. This is the Trinity baptism formula the majority of "Christianity" adheres to. In spite of the numerous direct commands to baptize in Jesus Name (Acts 10:48; 2:3-8), what seem to be direct accounts of baptism services in Jesus Name (Acts 8:16; 19:5; 22:16), and other "types" (Rom. 6:3; Gal. 3:27; 1 Cor. 1:13) that all point to baptism being performed in the Name of Jesus by the Apostolic Church.
There it is, the big one has been finally found, it was just a matter of time, the error and factual proof that this syriac text is a copy and incorrect. Not just factual, but textual, it does not agree with itself, just like the greek did in this area.
That is two, the missing name in matthew and this one. Now are you going to make up wild claims and excuses for this one also, such as the gowra genealogy theories Dave? Why not break out some calculations and look for codes in the text to validate it while your at it?
Let me help you out, why not say something was implied here within the text, that when Paul said to do all things in His name, he really meant something else.