02-06-2005, 04:53 PM
Shlama akhi Dave,
For your info, Codex Bobiensis is an uncial Old Latin manuscript. Only fragments of it survives today. The fragments of this 4th or 5th century A.D. manuscript is kept in Biblioteca Nazionale, Torino, Italy.
You can only find the following passages in Codex Bobiensis:
Matthew 1:1 - 3:10; 4:1-14:17; 15:20-36
Mark 8:8-16:8
It is designated as k in Nestle-Aland's Novum Testamentum Graece. You can check it out. Probably you can give a comment on the reading in Matthew 14:12.
The majority text has swma (body). Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus have ptwma (corpse) just like Peshitta " [font=Estrangelo (V1.1)]hdl4[/font] ".
Clearly some copyists of the Greek NT mistaken ptwma for swma.
It is interesting to note that according to Nestle-Aland's critical apparatus, Codex Bobiensis follows the reading of the Aramaic Peshitta for this passage but not Mark 16:9-20 of the Peshitta.
For your info, Codex Bobiensis is an uncial Old Latin manuscript. Only fragments of it survives today. The fragments of this 4th or 5th century A.D. manuscript is kept in Biblioteca Nazionale, Torino, Italy.
You can only find the following passages in Codex Bobiensis:
Matthew 1:1 - 3:10; 4:1-14:17; 15:20-36
Mark 8:8-16:8
It is designated as k in Nestle-Aland's Novum Testamentum Graece. You can check it out. Probably you can give a comment on the reading in Matthew 14:12.
The majority text has swma (body). Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus have ptwma (corpse) just like Peshitta " [font=Estrangelo (V1.1)]hdl4[/font] ".
Clearly some copyists of the Greek NT mistaken ptwma for swma.
It is interesting to note that according to Nestle-Aland's critical apparatus, Codex Bobiensis follows the reading of the Aramaic Peshitta for this passage but not Mark 16:9-20 of the Peshitta.
One of the first owners of the facsimile of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0802837867/ref=nosim/ultimyourulti-20"><b>Codex Leningrad</b></a>