11-13-2004, 11:30 AM
Shalama to all
I was having a discussion recently with a lecturer in Christianities of the East, and she informed me that the early Eastern Church initially regarded the Catholic Epistles as spurious, and were not actually accepted.
If this is so, then did the Peshitta contain Matthew to Acts, or was Acts not accepted either? Can anyone direct me to more information?
Please can someone clear this up
Thanks <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->
John S
I was having a discussion recently with a lecturer in Christianities of the East, and she informed me that the early Eastern Church initially regarded the Catholic Epistles as spurious, and were not actually accepted.
If this is so, then did the Peshitta contain Matthew to Acts, or was Acts not accepted either? Can anyone direct me to more information?
Please can someone clear this up
Thanks <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->
John S