08-23-2004, 12:36 AM
Chris,
If you are gonna actually do justice for Dave here, then don't associate satan and his work in the same sentence. No matter what you were attempting to emulate through that, you have to remember that a good percentage of people glaze over things at times rather than try to truley understand the meaning. Dave's work is completely different from what people are used to, so let it speak for itself, people will figure it out. Your opinions are clouding things.
In this instance, mister Roth and Rob are completely correct. All one has to do is buy the book "The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible" and read it from front to cover. All the versions are put together in comparison with the dead sea scrolls. Anyone is able to easily discern that all the versions have some sort of scrible error. At the same time, you will NOT see any plot to discredit the coming messiah in the MT or any other assumptions that the superstitious crowd always believes. There are no complete sentences missing or misconstrued sentences structures that make the text say something completely different. All that sort of nonsense is complete superstition.
The dead sea scrolls have been dated from before Jesus walked the earth so they are a very, very, very, accurate source for comparison. What's the final verdict? The text was handed down to us with the normal amount of scribal errors that one would expect from over a 1,000 years. That is with any of the versions, Samaritan, LXX, MT, no matter what.
I've pointed this out months ago to you. I can attack you if I want, but at this moment, I'm not. I do laugh at you and your complete disregard for mainstream Christianity, your manifestation doctrine, you attack on your brethren on your website, so forth and so on, but I do have a very serious side to me, and I'm emulating that at the moment.
If you are gonna actually do justice for Dave here, then don't associate satan and his work in the same sentence. No matter what you were attempting to emulate through that, you have to remember that a good percentage of people glaze over things at times rather than try to truley understand the meaning. Dave's work is completely different from what people are used to, so let it speak for itself, people will figure it out. Your opinions are clouding things.
In this instance, mister Roth and Rob are completely correct. All one has to do is buy the book "The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible" and read it from front to cover. All the versions are put together in comparison with the dead sea scrolls. Anyone is able to easily discern that all the versions have some sort of scrible error. At the same time, you will NOT see any plot to discredit the coming messiah in the MT or any other assumptions that the superstitious crowd always believes. There are no complete sentences missing or misconstrued sentences structures that make the text say something completely different. All that sort of nonsense is complete superstition.
The dead sea scrolls have been dated from before Jesus walked the earth so they are a very, very, very, accurate source for comparison. What's the final verdict? The text was handed down to us with the normal amount of scribal errors that one would expect from over a 1,000 years. That is with any of the versions, Samaritan, LXX, MT, no matter what.
I've pointed this out months ago to you. I can attack you if I want, but at this moment, I'm not. I do laugh at you and your complete disregard for mainstream Christianity, your manifestation doctrine, you attack on your brethren on your website, so forth and so on, but I do have a very serious side to me, and I'm emulating that at the moment.