![]() |
|
The early pronunciations - Printable Version +- Peshitta Forum (http://peshitta.org/for) +-- Forum: New Testament (http://peshitta.org/for/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Aramaic Primacy Forum (http://peshitta.org/for/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: The early pronunciations (/showthread.php?tid=904) |
The early pronunciations - Aram - 06-19-2004 Shlama, Not expert of Aramaic am I but there is something to say about its dialectical pronunciation. When we look at the Greek translations, we see words 'maran ata'. The developed western pronunciation is 'moran', the eastern is 'maran'. I see here that the eastern pronunciation preserved the archaic style of the New Testament writings pronunciations at that time. The internal evidence is most trustworthy for me. What do You think? Ivan. - Paul Younan - 06-19-2004 Shlama Ivan, See the Gouden Hoorn, the Journal of Byzantium article by Edip Ayden (a speaker of the Western dialect) titled "A bird's eye view of the Syriac language and literature", Volume 5, issue 1 (summer 1997) here http://isidore-of-seville.com/goudenhoorn/51edip.html Edip Ayden Wrote:Eastern and Western Pronunciation Also, see "Notes from Nineveh" by Rev. J. P. Fletcher (the bottom of page 59 and the top of page 60) here: http://www.peshitta.org/pdf/nfn.pdf Towards the original of Hebrew Aramaic - Ivan Pavlovich Ostapyuk - 07-05-2004 Two major dialects of Aramaic: Eastern and Western. The western Aramaic included Hebrew Aramaic. But what about the ancient pronunciation? Logically, western should produce western. But when we look at maran ata, it matches to the eastern pronunciation. The Greek manuscripts were translated in the west. As we see the ancient western 1st century pronunciation matches more to the modern eastern pronunciation. Ivan |