Peshitta Forum
Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Printable Version

+- Peshitta Forum (http://peshitta.org/for)
+-- Forum: New Testament (http://peshitta.org/for/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: General (http://peshitta.org/for/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? (/showthread.php?tid=1769)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Spyridon - 09-15-2008

Today, I received Rev. Bauscher's translation of the Peshitta in the mail. What church denomination or sectarian movement is he affiliated with? What is the name of his congregation? Is his translation accurate and reliable?


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Thirdwoe - 09-15-2008

You could ask him what church denomination or sectarian movement he is affiliated with and what the name of his congregation is. He may be good enough to tell you himself.

As to if his translation is reliable, read it and check it to see if it is....it is not too hard to check these things out these days for oneself with all the helps online these days....I do it all the time and am quite unlearned..

Taking another's idea, even if they are an Expert on something is worth less than just taking their word on it without checking it out for ones self. But 1st, I would recomend listening to the still small voice of the Holy Spirit within you to see what God says about it. That trumps all other voices....

I have, and He told me a couple of things already....


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Spyridon - 09-16-2008

What were you told?


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - aramaic_albion - 09-16-2008

Dear Spyridon,

Dave Bauscher used to be on this Forum.

His 'Plain English' Peshitta NT is pretty good, with the exception of him using 'Jehovah' for the Sacred Name.

He is a former Baptist Minister who is involved with a home church now.

He believes that there are "codes" hidden within the Peshitta NT text.

Others also believe this.

I would say that Dave's 'Plain English' translation is a better translation than Janet Magiera's translation.

'Thirdwoe' is right, the Holy Spirit will answer your questions, more fully than I (or anyone else) ever could!

Hope that this helps.

Shlama, Albion





Spyridon Wrote:Today, I received Rev. Bauscher's translation of the Peshitta in the mail. What church denomination or sectarian movement is he affiliated with? What is the name of his congregation? Is his translation accurate and reliable?



Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Thirdwoe - 09-16-2008

Brothers, I have been wanting to see if others see what I have seen here.

Here are a few lines from Mr. Bauschers translation of 1st Corinthians....

Take some time and read every line and tell me what you find that is wrong here....


1st Corinthians Chapter 12

12:10 But to another miracles and to another prophecy; to another discernment of spirits; to another, kinds of languages; to another, translation of languages;

12:28 For God has set first in the church, Apostles; after them Prophets; after them, Teachers; after them, miracle workers; after them, gifts of healing, helpers, leaders, different languages.

12:29 Are they all Apostles? Are they all Prophets? Are they all Teachers? Are they all miracle workers?

12:30 Do all have gifts of healing? Do all of them speak with languages? Or do all of them translate?


1st Corinthians Chapter 14

1. Run after love and be zealous for the gifts of The Spirit, but especially that you may prophesy.

2. For whoever speaks in languages does not speak to men, but he is speaking to God, for no man understands what he speaks, but by The Spirit he speaks mysteries.

4. He who speaks in languages builds himself up, and he who prophesies builds the church up.

5. I wish that all of you might speak in languages, but all the more that you may prophesy, for he who prophesies is greater than he who speaks in languages, unless he translates; but if he translates, he edifies the church.

6. And now my brethren, if I come to you and speak languages with you, what do I benefit you, unless I shall speak with you either by revelation or knowledge or by prophecy or by teaching?

7. For even inanimate things which give sound, whether a flute or harp, if they make no distinction between one tone and another, how will anything that is played or anything that is harped be known?

8. For if a trumpet make a sound which is not distinct, who will be prepared for battle?

9. So you also, if you will say words in languages and you will not translate, how will anything be known that you say, for you yourselves will be as one who is speaking to the air.

10. For behold, there are many kinds of languages in the world, and there is not one of them without sound.

11. And if I do not know the import of the sound, I am a foreigner to him who speaks, and also he who speaks is a foreigner to me.

12. So also you, because you are zealous of the gifts of The Spirit for the edification of the church, should seek to excel.

13. And he who speaks in languages, let him pray to translate.
14. For if I should pray in languages, my spirit is praying, but my understanding is unfruitful.

15. What therefore shall I do? I shall pray with my spirit, and I shall pray also with my understanding. I shall sing with my spirit, and I shall sing also with my understanding.

16. Otherwise, if you say a blessing in The Spirit, he who fills the place of the unlearned, how will he say amen for your giving of thanks, because he does not know what you said?

17. For you bless well, but your neighbor is not edified.

18. I thank God that I am speaking in languages more than all of you,

19. But in the church I would rather speak five words with my understanding, that I may instruct others also, than 10,000 words in languages.

20. My brethren, do not be children in your intellects, but be infants in evil and be fully mature in your intellects.

21. It is written in the law, "With foreign speech and with another language I shall speak with this people, and not even in this way will they hear me, says THE LORD JEHOVAH.???

22. So then languages are established for a sign, not for believers, but for unbelievers, but prophecy is not for unbelievers, but for those who believe.

23. If therefore it should happen that the whole church assembles and everyone would speak in languages, and the uninitiated or those who are unbelievers should enter, would they not say that such have gone insane?

24. But if all of you would prophesy and the unlearned or an unbeliever should enter, he is searched out by all of you and he is reproved by all of you.

25. And the secrets of his heart are revealed and then he will fall on his face and worship God and he will say, "Truly, God is in you."

26. I say therefore, my brethren, that whenever you gather, whoever among you has a Psalm, let him speak, or whoever has a teaching, or whoever has a revelation, or whoever has a language, or whoever has a translation, let all things be done for edification.

27. And if any speak in languages, let two speak, or as many as three, and let each one speak and let one translate.

28. And if there is no translator, let he who speaks in a language be silent in the church and let him speak to himself and to God.

29. But let two or three Prophets speak and the others discern.

30. And if something is revealed to another while the first is sitting, let him be quiet.

31. For you can all prophesy one by one, that each person may teach and everyone may be comforted.

32. For the spirit of the Prophet is subject to the Prophet,

33. Because God is not chaotic, but peaceful, as in all the assemblies of The Holy Ones.


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - aramaic_albion - 09-16-2008

Dear Thirdwoe,

You know, I hardly ever read Dave's translation........but that's a VERY POOR translation.

A Faulty translation even......influenced by Dave's own work (translation).

That's scary, that I've not seen what a faulty translation that some of his work is.

We have to be VERY CAREFUL when translating Scripture!

Thanks for the heads up, Thirdwoe!

Shlama, Albion


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Spyridon - 09-16-2008

What exactly is wrong with the translation? Please be specific. Is it inaccurate?


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Christina - 09-16-2008

I'll compile a comparrison chart between Bauscher & Mageira for 1 Cor. 12 & 14, something doesn't look right here. Will try to post it tonight or tomorrow, stay tuned...


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - aramaic_albion - 09-16-2008

You know Bauscher was a kind of Preterist, and for sure he was a Univeralist.

If he was "a full Preterist", he believed in the complete cessation of Gifts from the Holy Spirit.

That's probably why he translated here the way that he did.

I got Magiera's translation out and checked it against Bauscher's, and it's COMPLETELY different about "languages" versus "TONGUES".

Dave obvisously believed in the cessation of tongues along with the other Gifts of the Holy Spirit, in the First Century.

His translation is mis-leading, and I would say that he is spiritually endangering himself, and others, who believe his Interlinear Aramaic/English New Testament is correctly translated.

MarYah threatens these sorts of "translators" in Yohannon's Revelation.

From this point, I'd say AVOID DAVE BAUSCHER'S TRANSLATIONS.

Sad, sad, sad.

Albion


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Christina - 09-16-2008

Bauscher vs. Mageira:

Bauscher in red and Mageira in blue:

1 Corinthians 12:

(12:10) But to another miracles and to another prophecy; to another discernment of spirits; to another, kinds of languages; to another, translation of languages;
(12:10) now for another, miracles, now for another, prophecy, now for another, discerning of spirits, now for another, kinds of tongues, now for another, the interpretation of tongues.

(12:28) For God has set first in the church, Apostles; after them Prophets; after them, Teachers; after them, miracle workers; after them, gifts of healing, helpers, leaders, different languages.
(12:28) For God set in his church, first apostles, after them, prophets, after them, teachers, after them, workers of miracles, after them, gifts of healing and helpers and leaders and kinds of tongues.
(12:29) Are they all Apostles? Are they all Prophets? Are they all Teachers? Are they all miracle workers?
(12:29) [Are] all of them apostles? [Are] all of them prophets? [Are] all of them teachers? [Are] all of them doers of miracles?
(12:30) Do all have gifts of healing? Do all of them speak with languages? Or do all of them translate?
(12:30) Do all of them have gifts of healing? Do all of them speak in tongues? Or do all of them interpret?

1 Corinthians 14:

(14:1) Run after love and be zealous for the gifts of The Spirit, but especially that you may prophesy.
(14:1) Pursue love and be zealous about the gifts of the Spirit, but especially to prophesy.
(14:2) For whoever speaks in languages does not speak to men, but he is speaking to God, for no man understands what he speaks, but by The Spirit he speaks mysteries.
(14:2) For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men, but to God, for no one understands anything that he speaks, but spiritually he speaks a mystery.

(14:4) He who speaks in languages builds himself up, and he who prophesies builds the church up.
(14:4) He who speaks in a tongue builds himself up and he who prophesies builds up the church.
(14:5) I wish that all of you might speak in languages, but all the more that you may prophesy, for he who prophesies is greater than he who speaks in languages, unless he translates; but if he translates, he edifies the church.
(14:5) Now I am desiring that all of you would speak in tongues and especially that you would prophesy. For greater is he who prophesies than he who speaks in a tongue, unless he interprets. Now if he interprets, he edifies the church.
(14:6) And now my brethren, if I come to you and speak languages with you, what do I benefit you, unless I shall speak with you either by revelation or knowledge or by prophecy or by teaching?
(14:6) And now, my brothers, if I come to you and speak with you in tongues, what am I profiting you, unless I speak with you either by revelation or by knowledge or by prophecy or by teaching?
(14:7) For even inanimate things which give sound, whether a flute or harp, if they make no distinction between one tone and another, how will anything that is played or anything that is harped be known?
(14:7) For even those things that have no life and give out sound, whether flute or harp, if they do not make a distinction between one tone and the other, how is what is sung or what is played known?
(14:8) For if a trumpet make a sound which is not distinct, who will be prepared for battle?
(14:8) And if the trumpet should sound a sound that is not distinct, who will prepare for the battle?
(14:9) So you also, if you will say words in languages and you will not translate, how will anything be known that you say, for you yourselves will be as one who is speaking to the air.
(14:9) Likewise also, if you speak a message in a tongue and it will not be interpreted, how is what you spoke known? You will be as if you are speaking to the air.
(14:10) For behold, there are many kinds of languages in the world, and there is not one of them without sound.
(14:10) For behold, there are many kinds of tongues in the world and there is not one of them without meaning.
(14:11) And if I do not know the import of the sound, I am a foreigner to him who speaks, and also he who speaks is a foreigner to me. (14:11) But if I do not know the significance of the sound, I will be a barbarian to him who speaks, and also he who speaks will be a barbarian to me.
(14:12) So also you, because you are zealous of the gifts of The Spirit for the edification of the church, should seek to excel.
(14:12) Likewise also, because you are zealous of the gifts of the Spirit, seek to excel for the building up of the church.
(14:13) And he who speaks in languages, let him pray to translate.
(14:13) And he who speaks in a tongue should seek to interpret [it].
(14:14) For if I should pray in languages, my spirit is praying, but my understanding is unfruitful.
(14:14) For if I was to pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my understanding is without fruit.
(14:15) What therefore shall I do? I shall pray with my spirit, and I shall pray also with my understanding. I shall sing with my spirit, and I shall sing also with my understanding.
(14:15) What then should I do? I will pray in my spirit and I will pray also with my understanding. And I will sing in my spirit and I will sing with my understanding also.
(14:16) Otherwise, if you say a blessing in The Spirit, he who fills the place of the unlearned, how will he say amen for your giving of thanks, because he does not know what you said?
(14:16) Otherwise, if you bless spiritually, how will he who fills the place of the unlearned say "Amen" at your thanksgiving, because he does not know what you said?
(14:17) For you bless well, but your neighbor is not edified.
(14:17) For you are blessing well, but your associate is not built up.
(14:18) I thank God that I am speaking in languages more than all of you.
(14:18) I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you.
(14:19) But in the church I would rather speak five words with my understanding, that I may instruct others also, than 10,000 words in languages.
(14:19) But in the church I desire to speak five words with my understanding, so that I would also teach others, rather than a great number of words in a tongue.
(14:20) My brethren, do not be children in your intellects, but be infants in evil and be fully mature in your intellects.
(14:20) My brothers, do not be children in your minds. But rather, be babies to evil [things] and be mature in your minds.
(14:21) It is written in the law, "With foreign speech and with another language I shall speak with this people, and not even in this way will they hear me, says THE LORD JEHOVAH.???
(14:21) In the law it is written: WITH A STRANGE SPEECH AND WITH ANOTHER TONGUE I WILL SPEAK WITH THIS PEOPLE. EVEN SO, THEY WILL NOT HEAR ME, says the LORD.
(14:22) So then languages are established for a sign, not for believers, but for unbelievers, but prophecy is not for unbelievers, but for those who believe.
(14:22) Then tongues are placed for a sign, not to believers, but to those who do not believe. And prophecies are not to those who do not believe, but to those who believe.
(14:23) If therefore it should happen that the whole church assembles and everyone would speak in languages, and the uninitiated or those who are unbelievers should enter, would they not say that such have gone insane?
(14:23) If therefore all the church is gathered and all would speak in tongues and unlearned [ones] or those who do not believe should enter, will they not say, "These [people] are crazy"?
(14:24) But if all of you would prophesy and the unlearned or an unbeliever should enter, he is searched out by all of you and he is reproved by all of you.
(14:24) And if all of you would prophesy and an unlearned [one] or one who does not believe enters, he is examined by all of you and reproved by all of you
(14:25) And the secrets of his heart are revealed and then he will fall on his face and worship God and he will say, "Truly, God is in you."
(14:25) and the hidden [things] of his heart are revealed. And then he will fall on his face and will worship God and will say, "Truly God is with you."
(14:26) I say therefore, my brethren, that whenever you gather, whoever among you has a Psalm, let him speak, or whoever has a teaching, or whoever has a revelation, or whoever has a language, or whoever has a translation, let all things be done for edification.
(14:26) Therefore, my brothers, I say that when you are gathered, whoever of you has a psalm should speak. And he who has a teaching and he who has a revelation and he who has a tongue and he who has an interpretation, all of them should be for building up.
(14:27) And if any speak in languages, let two speak, or as many as three, and let each one speak and let one translate.
(14:27) And if someone speaks in a tongue, two should speak and at the most three. And they should speak one by one and [that] one should interpret.
(14:28) And if there is no translator, let he who speaks in a language be silent in the church and let him speak to himself and to God.
(14:28) And if there is not one to interpret, he who speaks in a tongue should keep silent in the church and should speak to himself and to God.
(14:29) But let two or three Prophets speak and the others discern.
(14:29) And the prophets should speak, two or three, and the rest should discern.
(14:30) And if something is revealed to another while the first is sitting, let him be quiet.
(14:30) And if [something] is revealed to another while he sits, the first should be silent.
(14:31) For you can all prophesy one by one, that each person may teach and everyone may be comforted.
(14:31) For all of you can prophesy one by one, so that everyone may learn and everyone may be comforted.
(14:32) For the spirit of the Prophet is subject to the Prophet,
(14:32) For the spirit of the prophets is subject to the prophets,
(14:33) Because God is not chaotic, but peaceful, as in all the assemblies of The Holy Ones.
(14:33) because God is not [one] of confusion, but of peace, as in all the churches of the holy [ones].

I prefer Mageira's rendering, comments anyone?


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - aramaic_albion - 09-16-2008

Dear Christina,

Very GOOD JOB!

Thanks for posting both versions.

And yes, I agree......Magiera is definately much more trustworthy!

Even MORE the reason for akhi Andrew's Mari/PEACE to come out soon, and be a TRUSTWORTHY translation!

Thanks again for your hard work here Christina!

Shlama, Albion


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Christina - 09-16-2008

Toddah akhi Albion <!-- s:bigups: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/bigups.gif" alt=":bigups:" title="Big Ups" /><!-- s:bigups: -->

You know from a linguistic/lexical position Bauscher's translation is not inaccurate but I still sense something is wrong here. I can't quite put my finger on it, it's right but it's wrong, get what I'm saying? <!-- sHuh --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" /><!-- sHuh -->

You know despite that the fact I have both Bauscher & Mageira on my pc, the only English version I actually read so far is akhan Paul's interlinear. And yip, I'm sure akhan Andrew won't disappoint and that I'll definitely study his translation when I get my hands on a copy.


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Amatsyah - 09-16-2008

Shlama all,

I wouldn't say that Bauscher's translation is "different" as in wrong - it just sounds different to the ears. But actually, if you follow closely line by line, you can see that Dave's translation is still the same. I think he was a faithful translator - as to whether he gave the best rendition known to mankind or not, I think is a matter left to both linguistic specialists and to the reader's ear. But to say "kinds of languages" instead of "kinds of tongues", and "translation of languages" instead of "the interpretation of tongues" is not fallacious. To the cessationist, "tongues" could be theologically argued against, while to the non-cessationist "languages" could be theologically argued against; but I think to the linguist neither rendition is wrong, and in fact both can be correct. I think it really boils down to preference of the respective translator.

Thanks a million again, Christina, for doing the hard work of typing both translations out. I actually wouldn't mind a translation itself that looked like that (Dave B. / Magiera, line-for-line). Or for that matter, one with Lamsa, Etheridge, and Murdock line-for-line, or side-by-side.

And don't get me wrong, "languages" and especially "translation of languages" as opposed to "interpretation" is strange and hard on my ears as well. But a translator can find certain flexibilities without being a poor, wrong, or for that matter unfaithful, translator. If I felt otherwise about Dave B.'s translations, then I wouldn't have written a review for his books at Amazon. Be that as it may, I already know that I'm not going to agree with him on everything theologically, and that his particular theology, whatever it may be, is going to crop up in his translational work there and again. I don't know that he's a cessationist - in fact, I do know that he does believe in the operation of prophecy today, from personal correspondance, so if that makes him less than a "full preterist", then I don't know what kind of preterist he is, exactly. But taking his work line-for-line against Magiera's does not to my eyes (ears are a different story) give a radically different rendering - lexically they're compatible.

Albeit, I am curious about 1 Cor. 14:31:

For you can all prophesy one by one, that each person may teach and everyone may be comforted.
For all of you can prophesy one by one, so that everyone may learn and everyone may be comforted.

This is why some have said before, that each translation should be in a believer's library. To each one, their own preference. But the Aramaic language, like Hebrew, is not static, so variations are to expected - even between Andrew Gabriel Roth's and Paul Younan's. If I sincerely felt that Dave B. had a sinister agenda and was out to purposely pervert the Text, or warp It without conscience as Lamsa did in certain places, then I'd write a different story here. But I don't believe that universalists, preterists, calvinists, or premillenialists are automatically barred from the task of translating. History's men who've given the Text-received, have been quite the eclectic bunch, for sure! Refer not only to Dave B.'s NT in Plain English, but also to his Interlinear, and you'll see what a genuine, Godly passion for the Scripture he possesses. This is one reason why I chose to compare him against Bart Ehrman in my Amazon review. BIG difference in motive! I never promised anyone that Dave was going to translate the Aramaic into English that everybody would agree upon. Only that he was, and is, a faithful translator. I think credit needs to be given where credit is due. Preferences are an entirely different critter.

Blessings,

Ryan


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Amatsyah - 09-16-2008

Shlama Christina,

Quote:You know from a linguistic/lexical position Bauscher's translation is not inaccurate

LOL! Nice choice of words! Or, I guess since you posted first, while I was still typing unawares, I had the nice choice of words. Guess we're on "the same page" here, LOL!

~Ryan


Re: Who is Rev. David Bauscher? - Christina - 09-16-2008

While I'm at it I suppose I could throw in Victor Alexander's renderings:

12:10 To others, however, excellence in languages, to others then the interpretation of languages.

12:28 For God consecrated in his church, first apostles, later prophets, teachers, performers of works, later the gifts of healing, ministering, leaders and linguists.
12:29 Why not all apostles? Why not all prophets? Why not all teachers? Why not all performers of power?
12:30 Why did not all have the gift of healing? Why did not all speak different tongues? Or why did not all interpret?

14:1 Pursue love and take on the gifts of the Spirit, moreover then that you may prophesy.
14:2 For whoever speaks in the language,* is not speaking to humanity, except to God. For no human being hears what they say, except they express the sermon through the Spirit.
14:3 Those then who prophesy, they speak to humanity, constructive, heartfelt and eloquent.
14:4 Whoever speaks in tongues, they fortify themselves, and whoever prophesies, they build a church.
14:5 I wish then that you all speak in tongues, more so that you may prophesy. For they are greater that prophesy than those who speak in tongues but without interpretation.* If, however, there is interpretation, then a congregation is formed.
14:6 And now, brethren, if I came and spoke to you in tongues, how will I enrich you, except if I speak to you [plainly], or through revelation, knowledge, prophesy or learning?
14:7 Even speaking of those things that have no soul, that make sounds, whether flute or guitar, if we cannot distinguish between the song of one with its accompaniment, how will one know what is sung and what is strummed?
14:8 And if the horn sounds are indistinguishable, who will heed the call of battle?
14:9 Likewise you too, if you proclaim the manifestation with your tongue and it cannot be interpreted, how will what you are saying be understood? You will be like someone speaking to the air.
14:10 For behold there are many types of languages in the world, and there is not one without a voice.
14:11 And if I do not know the intent of a voice, I am a barbarian to the one who utters it, and likewise the one who speaks, to me he is a barbarian.
14:12 Likewise, you also, because you are fervent toward the endowments of the Spirit in building the Church, may you increase in number.*
14:13 And the one who speaks with the tongue should pray so as to be clear.*
14:14 For if it happens that I pray with the tongue, it is my spirit that is praying, however, as far as I know, [my prayers] are fruitless.
14:15 Therefore, when I worship, I pray in my spirit and I also pray in my mind,* and I sing in my spirit and also in my mind.
14:16 And if not, if you are blessed in spirit, He who compliments* the domain of gifts, how shall He say Amen over your faith? This is why I say that you do not understand.
14:17 For you are well* blessed [in spirit then,] except your companion [who hears you] does not gain anything.*
14:18 I confess to God that I speak in tongues more than any of you.
14:19 Except in the church I wish to speak five words that make sense, so I can also teach others, rather than a myriad of words in tongues.
14:20 Brethren, do not be children in your outlook, except stand heroic* against evil and be mature in your opinions.
14:21 It is written in the Law that, "With foreign speech and in another tongue, shall His nation speak to this people, Even so they will not listen to me," said the Lord."
14:22 Therefore, tongues were consecrated for miracles, not for believers, except for those that did not believe. Prophesies, however, were not for those that did not believe, except for those that did believe.
14:23 If thus gathers the whole church and they all speak in tongues, and there enters those who know nothing or those that do not believe, will they not say what possesses them?
14:24 And if you are all prophesying and there enters one that knows nothing or that does not believe, he will feel inadequate and traitorous
14:25 And the secrets of his heart will be revealed and then he falls on his face,* and worships God and says, "Truly, God is in you."
14:26 I say thus, brethren, that when you gather, whoever of you has a psalm, tell it, and whoever has knowledge and whoever has a revelation and whoever has a tongue, and whoever has an interpretation -- all these that are modes of expression.*
14:27 And if a person speaks in a tongue, it is two who speak. And as they increase, three. And they speak one at a time,* and one interprets.
14:28 And if there is no interpreter, let him that speaks in tongues remain silent and let him speak between himself and God.
14:29 Prophets, however, speak two or three at a time and the rest should choose what to hear.*
14:30 And if it is to someone else who sits there, [a prophesy] is revealed, let the first one quiet down.
14:31 For you should be able to all prophesy one by one, so that each person may learn and each person may prophesy.
14:32 For the spirit of prophets submits to the prophets.
14:33 Because God is not the God of turmoil, except of peace, as in all the churches of the saints.

Footnotes:
*1 Cor 14:2 A reference to the sacred language of Scriptures.
*1 Cor 14:5.1 Lit. Ar. idiomatic expression: "If not interpreted."
*1 Cor 14:5.2 Lit. Ar. idiomatic construction: "A church is built."
*1 Cor 14:12 Lit. Ar. idiomatic expression: "Be wanting of increase."
*1 Cor 14:13 Lit. Ar. idiomatic figure of speech: "To be interpretive."
*1 Cor 14:15 Lit. Ar. id.: "Knowing."
*1 Cor 14:16 Lit. Ar. id.: "Fills in."
*1 Cor 14:17.1 Lit. Ar. id.: "Beautifully."
*1 Cor 14:17.2 Lit. Ar. idiomatic expression: "Is not built up."
*1 Cor 14:20 Lit. Ar. idiomatic expression: "Be boys."
*1 Cor 14:25 Lit. Ar. idiomatic expression: "Emerges over his face."
*1 Cor 14:26 Lit. Ar. id.: "Tongues."
*1 Cor 14:27 Lit. Ar. idiomatic expression: "And one one."
*1 Cor 14:29 Lit. Ar. idiomatic construction: "Prophets then two or three speak, and the rest choose."


It's an interesting passage for comparison.